Biggest jumps: FL-Atlantic (0.064); Oregon (0.036); LSU (0.022); Miami-OH (0.021); Boise State (0.018)
Biggest drops: UAB (-0.071); Hawaii (-0.024); Utah (-0.024); Tennessee (-0.021); Georgia (-0.019)
Full rankings after the jump.
Showing posts with label hawaii. Show all posts
Showing posts with label hawaii. Show all posts
Monday, December 9, 2019
Monday, October 14, 2019
Week 9: Full Rankings — RBA
Biggest jumps: Oregon State (0.086); Mississippi (0.067); South Carolina (0.064); Baylor (0.064); Hawaii (0.058)
Biggest drops: Nevada (-0.092); Vanderbilt (-0.078); Georgia Tech (-0.074); Kentucky (-0.063); Army (-0.060)
Full rankings after the jump.
Biggest drops: Nevada (-0.092); Vanderbilt (-0.078); Georgia Tech (-0.074); Kentucky (-0.063); Army (-0.060)
Full rankings after the jump.
Labels:
army,
baylor,
georgia tech,
hawaii,
kentucky,
mississippi,
nevada,
oregon state,
rankings,
south carolina,
vanderbilt
Monday, September 30, 2019
Week 7: Full Rankings — TFG
Biggest jumps: Cincinnati (0.166); Hawaii (0.155); North Carolina (0.127); Western Kentucky (0.126); Miami-OH (0.118)
Biggest drops: Maryland (-0.230); Georgia Tech (-0.167); Marshall (-0.130); Kansas State (-0.129); Kansas (-0.127)
Full rankings after the jump.
Biggest drops: Maryland (-0.230); Georgia Tech (-0.167); Marshall (-0.130); Kansas State (-0.129); Kansas (-0.127)
Full rankings after the jump.
Labels:
cincinnati,
georgia tech,
hawaii,
kansas,
kansas state,
marshall,
maryland,
miami-oh,
north carolina,
rankings,
Western Kentucky
Monday, October 22, 2018
Week 10: Full Rankings — RBA
Biggest jumps: Purdue (0.097); UCLA (0.090); Utah (0.069); UTEP (0.061); Charlotte (0.058)
Biggest drops: Auburn (-0.082); Southern Miss. (-0.057); California (-0.043); SJSU (-0.040); Hawaii (-0.039)
Full rankings after the jump.
Biggest drops: Auburn (-0.082); Southern Miss. (-0.057); California (-0.043); SJSU (-0.040); Hawaii (-0.039)
Full rankings after the jump.
Monday, September 10, 2018
Week 4: Full Rankings — RBA
Biggest jumps: Arizona St. (0.140); Fresno St. (0.134); Colorado (0.121); Hawaii (0.101); South Carolina (0.097)
Biggest drops: UTSA (-0.190); UAB (-0.121); UCLA (-0.119); FL-Atlantic (-0.118); Coastal Carolina (-0.093)
Full rankings after the jump.
Biggest drops: UTSA (-0.190); UAB (-0.121); UCLA (-0.119); FL-Atlantic (-0.118); Coastal Carolina (-0.093)
Full rankings after the jump.
Labels:
arizona state,
Coastal Carolina,
colorado,
FL-Atlantic,
fresno state,
hawaii,
rankings,
south carolina,
UAB,
ucla,
UTSA
Monday, September 3, 2018
Week 3: Full Rankings — RBA
Biggest jumps: Appalachian St. (0.165); Hawaii (0.110); LA Tech (0.064); Duke (0.062); Vanderbilt (0.055)
Biggest drops: SMU (-0.065); New Mexico St. (-0.062); Colorado St. (-0.058); FIU (-0.055); UTSA (-0.055)
Full rankings after the jump.
Biggest drops: SMU (-0.065); New Mexico St. (-0.062); Colorado St. (-0.058); FIU (-0.055); UTSA (-0.055)
Full rankings after the jump.
Labels:
Appalachian State,
colorado state,
duke,
FIU,
hawaii,
la tech,
new mexico state,
rankings,
smu,
UTSA,
vanderbilt
Monday, September 5, 2016
Week 3: Full Rankings — RBA
Biggest jumps: Hawaii (0.074); Boise St. (0.062); Army (0.050); Toledo (0.037); Tennessee (0.033)
Biggest drops: Northern Ill. (-0.084); Bowling Green (-0.057); Missouri (-0.047); FIU (-0.045); SMU (-0.044)
Full rankings after the jump.
Biggest drops: Northern Ill. (-0.084); Bowling Green (-0.057); Missouri (-0.047); FIU (-0.045); SMU (-0.044)
Full rankings after the jump.
Labels:
army,
boise state,
bowling green,
FIU,
hawaii,
missouri,
Northern Ill.,
rankings,
smu,
tennessee,
toledo
Sunday, December 2, 2012
Week 15: Full Rankings -- TFG
Biggest jumps: Arkansas St. (0.065); Pittsburgh (0.038); Texas State (0.034); West Virginia (0.028); Hawaii (0.023)
Biggest drops: Middle Tenn. (-0.060); South Florida (-0.043); Kansas (-0.035); Nebraska (-0.029); South Alabama (-0.019)
Full rankings after the jump.
Biggest drops: Middle Tenn. (-0.060); South Florida (-0.043); Kansas (-0.035); Nebraska (-0.029); South Alabama (-0.019)
Full rankings after the jump.
Monday, November 26, 2012
Week 14: Full Rankings -- RBA
Biggest jumps: Iowa St. (0.100); Ball St. (0.088); Connecticut (0.084); Miami-FL (0.070); Hawaii (0.060)
Biggest drops: Ohio (-0.162); Louisville (-0.160); Virginia Tech (-0.081); UNLV (-0.071); LA Tech (-0.053)
Full rankings after the jump.
Biggest drops: Ohio (-0.162); Louisville (-0.160); Virginia Tech (-0.081); UNLV (-0.071); LA Tech (-0.053)
Full rankings after the jump.
Labels:
ball state,
connecticut,
hawaii,
iowa state,
la tech,
louisville,
miami-fl,
ohio,
rankings,
unlv,
virginia tech
Week 14: Full Rankings -- TFG
Biggest jumps: Pittsburgh (0.047); Mississippi (0.042); Hawaii (0.040); Fresno St. (0.040); Memphis (0.036)
Biggest drops: Utah (-0.047); Auburn (-0.046); Rutgers (-0.045); UNLV (-0.040); Washington (-0.038)
Full rankings after the jump.
Biggest drops: Utah (-0.047); Auburn (-0.046); Rutgers (-0.045); UNLV (-0.040); Washington (-0.038)
Full rankings after the jump.
Labels:
auburn,
fresno state,
hawaii,
Memphis,
mississippi,
pittsburgh,
rankings,
rutgers,
unlv,
utah,
washington
Monday, October 1, 2012
Week 6: Full Rankings -- TFG
Biggest jumps: North Carolina (0.111); Texas Tech (0.100); South Alabama (0.097); Middle Tenn. (0.086); BYU (0.081)
Biggest drops: Hawaii (-0.090); Boise St. (-0.079); Ohio (-0.078); Georgia Tech (-0.077); Illinois (-0.076)
Full rankings after the jump.
Biggest drops: Hawaii (-0.090); Boise St. (-0.079); Ohio (-0.078); Georgia Tech (-0.077); Illinois (-0.076)
Full rankings after the jump.
Labels:
boise state,
byu,
georgia tech,
hawaii,
illinois,
Middle Tenn.,
north carolina,
ohio,
rankings,
South Alabama,
texas tech
Tuesday, November 15, 2011
Tuesday Trivia: Not All Undefeated Teams Are Created Equal
Going undefeated over the course of a college football season is a daunting prospect, and few teams have made it through a full season unscathed. Normally a team that finishes the regular season undefeated has a strong argument for inclusion in the national title game, and usually the human voters and computers sort out which of the undefeated teams should play for the title. Over the last few years, though, we've seen teams from outside the six BCS conferences make it to mid-December with a perfect record and argue they deserve a spot in a BCS bowl, if not the title game itself.
Do these claims have any merit?
Some say "no" just on the face of it. They argue that because of the weak schedule these teams face during the regular season that it'd be a surprise if they didn't go undefeated. They say that teams shouldn't be rewarded for playing a schedule full of New Mexicos, Utah States, and Louisiana Techs, no matter how well they do against them. They argue that even if such a team managed a victory against a BCS opponent early on in the season that it doesn't matter since it doesn't reflect sustained performance.
And in many cases they point to the 2007 Hawaii team, a team that went 12-0 in the Western Athletic Conference, only to be ground to a pulp by Georgia in the Sugar Bowl. It was the classic David versus Goliath story, except in this case David's sling broke and Goliath had ten of his closest Goliath-sized friends teach the pipsqueak a lesson, sending him back to his tribe as a warning to other potential upstarts. You mess with the bull, you get the horns.
That leaves us wondering, though: are all undefeated teams from outside the BCS conferences created equally? Was Hawaii representative of what an undefeated small-conference team looks like when they take on the might of the dominating SEC? Or are other teams from recent years and the upsets they accomplished the true story?
In order to answer this we took the seven non-BCS teams to finish undefeated in the regular season since 2003 and ranked them from worst to best. We'll look at their schedule, how they played through the year -- the whole body of work, as it were -- and the prediction facing that team as they entered their bowl game.
The full story is after the jump.
Do these claims have any merit?
Some say "no" just on the face of it. They argue that because of the weak schedule these teams face during the regular season that it'd be a surprise if they didn't go undefeated. They say that teams shouldn't be rewarded for playing a schedule full of New Mexicos, Utah States, and Louisiana Techs, no matter how well they do against them. They argue that even if such a team managed a victory against a BCS opponent early on in the season that it doesn't matter since it doesn't reflect sustained performance.
And in many cases they point to the 2007 Hawaii team, a team that went 12-0 in the Western Athletic Conference, only to be ground to a pulp by Georgia in the Sugar Bowl. It was the classic David versus Goliath story, except in this case David's sling broke and Goliath had ten of his closest Goliath-sized friends teach the pipsqueak a lesson, sending him back to his tribe as a warning to other potential upstarts. You mess with the bull, you get the horns.
That leaves us wondering, though: are all undefeated teams from outside the BCS conferences created equally? Was Hawaii representative of what an undefeated small-conference team looks like when they take on the might of the dominating SEC? Or are other teams from recent years and the upsets they accomplished the true story?
In order to answer this we took the seven non-BCS teams to finish undefeated in the regular season since 2003 and ranked them from worst to best. We'll look at their schedule, how they played through the year -- the whole body of work, as it were -- and the prediction facing that team as they entered their bowl game.
The full story is after the jump.
Monday, September 19, 2011
Week 4: Full Rankings -- TFG
Biggest jumps: Kansas St. (0.113); Utah (0.105); Miami-FL (0.096); Vanderbilt (0.087); Tulane (0.084)
Biggest drops: Mississippi (-0.127); BYU (-0.093); Hawaii (-0.082); UAB (-0.074); Marshall (-0.067)
Full rankings after the jump.
Follow us on Twitter @TFGridiron
Biggest drops: Mississippi (-0.127); BYU (-0.093); Hawaii (-0.082); UAB (-0.074); Marshall (-0.067)
Full rankings after the jump.
| Rank | +/- | Team | WinPct | SoS | Adjusted | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Off. | Def. | Pace | |||||||||
| 1 | -- | Alabama | 0.945 | 0.528 | 45 | 28.8 | 7 | 9.3 | 1 | 159.1 | 107 |
| 2 | -- | Boise St. | 0.915 | 0.471 | 74 | 28.8 | 8 | 11.2 | 3 | 166.6 | 59 |
| 3 | +2 | Stanford | 0.898 | 0.499 | 64 | 31.1 | 1 | 13.0 | 8 | 160.4 | 98 |
| 4 | +2 | Oklahoma | 0.896 | 0.653 | 9 | 25.5 | 17 | 10.8 | 2 | 179.7 | 6 |
| 5 | +2 | LSU | 0.890 | 0.690 | 5 | 29.5 | 3 | 12.8 | 7 | 156.1 | 118 |
| 6 | -2 | Florida | 0.885 | 0.516 | 56 | 26.4 | 12 | 11.6 | 4 | 161.9 | 92 |
| 7 | -4 | Ohio St. | 0.863 | 0.481 | 68 | 24.2 | 19 | 11.6 | 5 | 158.3 | 110 |
| 8 | +1 | Oregon | 0.862 | 0.645 | 11 | 27.5 | 10 | 13.2 | 10 | 185.5 | 1 |
| 9 | +4 | Wisconsin | 0.859 | 0.474 | 71 | 29.8 | 2 | 14.5 | 18 | 158.4 | 109 |
| 10 | -2 | TCU | 0.854 | 0.429 | 89 | 29.0 | 5 | 14.3 | 16 | 163.3 | 80 |
| 11 | -- | Virginia Tech | 0.854 | 0.531 | 41 | 25.7 | 16 | 12.7 | 6 | 156.2 | 116 |
| 12 | -2 | Arkansas | 0.806 | 0.533 | 40 | 27.5 | 9 | 15.6 | 26 | 169.5 | 36 |
| 13 | -1 | Florida St. | 0.803 | 0.632 | 14 | 26.0 | 15 | 14.8 | 22 | 157.5 | 114 |
| 14 | +5 | Texas A&M | 0.790 | 0.557 | 32 | 22.4 | 33 | 13.2 | 9 | 176.3 | 12 |
| 15 | +14 | Miami-FL | 0.781 | 0.693 | 4 | 23.6 | 22 | 14.2 | 14 | 166.9 | 53 |
| 16 | +15 | Utah | 0.781 | 0.509 | 57 | 24.0 | 21 | 14.5 | 17 | 165.5 | 69 |
| 17 | -2 | Oklahoma St. | 0.779 | 0.524 | 49 | 26.1 | 13 | 15.8 | 29 | 182.8 | 2 |
| 18 | -1 | Nebraska | 0.758 | 0.523 | 50 | 24.1 | 20 | 15.3 | 25 | 165.9 | 64 |
| 19 | -5 | Auburn | 0.753 | 0.634 | 13 | 29.1 | 4 | 18.7 | 55 | 169.7 | 33 |
| 20 | -2 | Georgia | 0.749 | 0.715 | 1 | 28.9 | 6 | 18.6 | 53 | 157.9 | 112 |
| 21 | -5 | West Virginia | 0.748 | 0.507 | 60 | 22.8 | 30 | 14.8 | 19 | 160.0 | 103 |
| 22 | +2 | Texas | 0.740 | 0.479 | 70 | 22.9 | 28 | 15.1 | 23 | 163.1 | 83 |
| 23 | -- | USC | 0.739 | 0.553 | 33 | 22.4 | 34 | 14.8 | 20 | 168.3 | 46 |
| 24 | -2 | Missouri | 0.735 | 0.561 | 31 | 20.5 | 49 | 13.6 | 11 | 171.2 | 25 |
| 25 | -5 | Iowa | 0.734 | 0.576 | 26 | 23.3 | 23 | 15.6 | 27 | 168.7 | 41 |
| 26 | +7 | Notre Dame | 0.729 | 0.630 | 17 | 22.0 | 38 | 14.8 | 21 | 169.1 | 39 |
| 27 | -6 | South Carolina | 0.727 | 0.659 | 8 | 27.3 | 11 | 18.5 | 51 | 160.0 | 102 |
| 28 | -2 | Clemson | 0.723 | 0.611 | 20 | 20.7 | 48 | 14.1 | 13 | 164.6 | 73 |
| 29 | +1 | Penn State | 0.694 | 0.668 | 7 | 19.9 | 53 | 14.3 | 15 | 164.0 | 78 |
| 30 | -2 | Pittsburgh | 0.691 | 0.536 | 39 | 22.5 | 32 | 16.3 | 33 | 164.3 | 76 |
| Rank | +/- | Team | WinPct | SoS | Adjusted | ||||||
| Off. | Def. | Pace | |||||||||
| 31 | -6 | Michigan St. | 0.670 | 0.525 | 48 | 22.8 | 31 | 17.1 | 39 | 160.3 | 100 |
| 32 | +5 | Tennessee | 0.665 | 0.632 | 15 | 23.1 | 25 | 17.6 | 45 | 165.3 | 72 |
| 33 | -1 | Arizona St. | 0.658 | 0.651 | 10 | 19.8 | 56 | 15.2 | 24 | 176.9 | 9 |
| 34 | -- | Illinois | 0.654 | 0.522 | 51 | 21.9 | 39 | 16.9 | 36 | 164.4 | 75 |
| 35 | +1 | South Florida | 0.654 | 0.499 | 63 | 18.1 | 72 | 14.0 | 12 | 168.7 | 42 |
| 36 | +6 | Georgia Tech | 0.653 | 0.488 | 65 | 26.1 | 14 | 20.3 | 66 | 157.7 | 113 |
| 37 | +20 | Kansas St. | 0.647 | 0.452 | 80 | 25.0 | 18 | 19.6 | 60 | 160.1 | 101 |
| 38 | -11 | UCF | 0.646 | 0.356 | 109 | 20.5 | 50 | 16.1 | 31 | 154.6 | 120 |
| 39 | +7 | Maryland | 0.626 | 0.613 | 19 | 21.5 | 42 | 17.4 | 42 | 173.9 | 18 |
| 40 | +11 | Texas Tech | 0.622 | 0.468 | 75 | 21.5 | 40 | 17.6 | 44 | 181.6 | 3 |
| 41 | +9 | Michigan | 0.609 | 0.505 | 61 | 23.1 | 26 | 19.4 | 57 | 168.8 | 40 |
| 42 | +1 | North Carolina | 0.606 | 0.566 | 28 | 19.9 | 54 | 16.8 | 35 | 162.6 | 90 |
| 43 | -2 | North Carolina St. | 0.605 | 0.574 | 27 | 21.4 | 44 | 18.1 | 48 | 170.6 | 26 |
| 44 | -9 | Mississippi St. | 0.598 | 0.603 | 21 | 18.3 | 70 | 15.6 | 28 | 169.6 | 34 |
| 45 | -- | Navy | 0.594 | 0.434 | 87 | 23.3 | 24 | 20.1 | 65 | 156.1 | 117 |
| 46 | +2 | Baylor | 0.593 | 0.675 | 6 | 22.9 | 29 | 19.7 | 61 | 174.9 | 15 |
| 47 | +2 | California | 0.579 | 0.550 | 34 | 20.0 | 52 | 17.6 | 46 | 167.3 | 50 |
| 48 | -9 | Arizona | 0.572 | 0.715 | 2 | 17.8 | 77 | 15.9 | 30 | 169.5 | 38 |
| 49 | +3 | Air Force | 0.571 | 0.539 | 37 | 19.1 | 64 | 17.0 | 37 | 165.4 | 70 |
| 50 | -12 | Nevada | 0.569 | 0.402 | 97 | 23.1 | 27 | 20.7 | 69 | 169.5 | 37 |
| 51 | +8 | Louisville | 0.563 | 0.483 | 67 | 19.4 | 61 | 17.6 | 47 | 160.4 | 99 |
| 52 | +3 | Tulsa | 0.543 | 0.473 | 72 | 21.1 | 46 | 19.7 | 62 | 176.9 | 10 |
| 53 | -9 | Northern Ill. | 0.539 | 0.388 | 101 | 22.2 | 35 | 20.9 | 72 | 166.0 | 63 |
| 54 | -7 | Kentucky | 0.539 | 0.472 | 73 | 18.5 | 69 | 17.4 | 41 | 163.1 | 82 |
| 55 | +1 | Oregon St. | 0.529 | 0.706 | 3 | 18.0 | 75 | 17.2 | 40 | 166.1 | 62 |
| 56 | -2 | Temple | 0.520 | 0.285 | 117 | 16.6 | 84 | 16.1 | 32 | 161.7 | 95 |
| 57 | +5 | Connecticut | 0.519 | 0.531 | 43 | 19.3 | 62 | 18.7 | 54 | 166.6 | 57 |
| 58 | -18 | BYU | 0.512 | 0.508 | 58 | 16.9 | 82 | 16.6 | 34 | 166.5 | 60 |
| 59 | +11 | Western Michigan | 0.507 | 0.285 | 118 | 19.6 | 60 | 19.4 | 58 | 170.6 | 28 |
| 60 | +5 | SDSU | 0.498 | 0.377 | 103 | 19.6 | 59 | 19.6 | 59 | 173.1 | 20 |
| Rank | +/- | Team | WinPct | SoS | Adjusted | ||||||
| Off. | Def. | Pace | |||||||||
| 61 | -- | Cincinnati | 0.496 | 0.468 | 76 | 22.0 | 37 | 22.1 | 81 | 169.8 | 31 |
| 62 | -2 | Washington | 0.491 | 0.624 | 18 | 21.0 | 47 | 21.3 | 74 | 165.8 | 65 |
| 63 | +4 | Iowa St. | 0.482 | 0.631 | 16 | 17.5 | 80 | 18.1 | 49 | 175.2 | 14 |
| 64 | -1 | Houston | 0.476 | 0.337 | 113 | 21.5 | 43 | 22.3 | 83 | 180.8 | 4 |
| 65 | +3 | Rutgers | 0.470 | 0.537 | 38 | 19.7 | 58 | 20.6 | 67 | 161.6 | 96 |
| 66 | -8 | Hawaii | 0.450 | 0.376 | 104 | 22.1 | 36 | 24.0 | 98 | 162.4 | 91 |
| 67 | -3 | Toledo | 0.447 | 0.530 | 44 | 19.9 | 55 | 21.6 | 77 | 172.1 | 21 |
| 68 | +5 | Troy | 0.441 | 0.421 | 95 | 19.2 | 63 | 21.1 | 73 | 179.0 | 7 |
| 69 | +6 | FIU | 0.434 | 0.360 | 108 | 18.7 | 66 | 20.8 | 71 | 166.3 | 61 |
| 70 | -4 | Southern Miss. | 0.430 | 0.346 | 111 | 19.0 | 65 | 21.3 | 75 | 174.3 | 17 |
| 71 | +13 | Ohio | 0.429 | 0.241 | 120 | 21.5 | 41 | 24.1 | 99 | 161.3 | 97 |
| 72 | -19 | Mississippi | 0.428 | 0.578 | 25 | 20.0 | 51 | 22.5 | 84 | 159.7 | 104 |
| 73 | -4 | Northwestern | 0.415 | 0.480 | 69 | 16.1 | 90 | 18.5 | 52 | 177.7 | 8 |
| 74 | -3 | Fresno St. | 0.409 | 0.508 | 59 | 21.3 | 45 | 24.7 | 100 | 162.8 | 85 |
| 75 | -1 | Colorado | 0.409 | 0.501 | 62 | 17.2 | 81 | 20.0 | 63 | 167.9 | 49 |
| 76 | +2 | LA Tech | 0.390 | 0.448 | 83 | 16.0 | 91 | 19.2 | 56 | 179.9 | 5 |
| 77 | -5 | East Carolina | 0.389 | 0.542 | 35 | 19.8 | 57 | 23.8 | 95 | 176.8 | 11 |
| 78 | +3 | Wake Forest | 0.379 | 0.593 | 23 | 18.6 | 68 | 22.7 | 87 | 168.0 | 47 |
| 79 | +15 | Vanderbilt | 0.377 | 0.563 | 30 | 14.3 | 102 | 17.5 | 43 | 166.6 | 58 |
| 80 | -- | SMU | 0.372 | 0.435 | 86 | 18.3 | 71 | 22.6 | 86 | 159.6 | 105 |
| 81 | -2 | Minnesota | 0.370 | 0.519 | 55 | 18.6 | 67 | 23.0 | 90 | 162.7 | 87 |
| 82 | +7 | Army | 0.353 | 0.409 | 96 | 17.8 | 76 | 22.7 | 88 | 156.8 | 115 |
| 83 | -1 | Syracuse | 0.351 | 0.525 | 47 | 16.3 | 87 | 20.8 | 70 | 163.0 | 84 |
| 84 | -7 | UCLA | 0.351 | 0.565 | 29 | 18.0 | 74 | 23.0 | 91 | 162.8 | 86 |
| 85 | -2 | Purdue | 0.350 | 0.462 | 77 | 14.3 | 101 | 18.3 | 50 | 174.3 | 16 |
| 86 | -10 | Boston College | 0.343 | 0.521 | 53 | 13.1 | 110 | 17.0 | 38 | 161.9 | 94 |
| 87 | +3 | Virginia | 0.335 | 0.520 | 54 | 15.8 | 93 | 20.7 | 68 | 169.9 | 30 |
| 88 | -- | Washington St. | 0.333 | 0.526 | 46 | 16.6 | 83 | 21.9 | 79 | 168.6 | 43 |
| 89 | -3 | Arkansas St. | 0.329 | 0.367 | 106 | 15.1 | 97 | 20.1 | 64 | 171.3 | 24 |
| 90 | +2 | Duke | 0.328 | 0.642 | 12 | 16.5 | 85 | 21.9 | 78 | 171.6 | 23 |
| Rank | +/- | Team | WinPct | SoS | Adjusted | ||||||
| Off. | Def. | Pace | |||||||||
| 91 | -4 | Kansas | 0.303 | 0.598 | 22 | 18.0 | 73 | 25.1 | 103 | 168.4 | 45 |
| 92 | +1 | Utah St. | 0.292 | 0.531 | 42 | 17.6 | 79 | 25.1 | 102 | 170.6 | 27 |
| 93 | -8 | Central Michigan | 0.290 | 0.422 | 93 | 15.9 | 92 | 22.8 | 89 | 167.3 | 51 |
| 94 | +2 | Miami-OH | 0.283 | 0.388 | 100 | 14.8 | 99 | 21.5 | 76 | 161.9 | 93 |
| 95 | -- | Bowling Green | 0.274 | 0.311 | 115 | 16.2 | 89 | 23.9 | 97 | 172.1 | 22 |
| 96 | +4 | Middle Tenn. | 0.265 | 0.325 | 114 | 15.0 | 98 | 22.6 | 85 | 175.7 | 13 |
| 97 | -- | UTEP | 0.262 | 0.274 | 119 | 15.6 | 95 | 23.7 | 94 | 165.7 | 66 |
| 98 | +1 | Indiana | 0.255 | 0.428 | 91 | 17.7 | 78 | 27.2 | 111 | 166.8 | 56 |
| 99 | -8 | Marshall | 0.248 | 0.424 | 92 | 14.1 | 103 | 22.0 | 80 | 166.9 | 52 |
| 100 | +1 | Rice | 0.229 | 0.436 | 84 | 16.5 | 86 | 26.7 | 107 | 169.6 | 35 |
| 101 | +9 | Tulane | 0.221 | 0.366 | 107 | 15.6 | 96 | 25.9 | 105 | 164.3 | 77 |
| 102 | -4 | Idaho | 0.216 | 0.436 | 85 | 14.8 | 100 | 24.7 | 101 | 169.8 | 32 |
| 103 | -- | LA-Lafayette | 0.204 | 0.377 | 102 | 16.3 | 88 | 28.1 | 114 | 168.6 | 44 |
| 104 | -2 | Wyoming | 0.202 | 0.433 | 88 | 13.6 | 108 | 23.5 | 92 | 166.9 | 55 |
| 105 | +7 | UNLV | 0.177 | 0.522 | 52 | 15.7 | 94 | 29.0 | 116 | 163.2 | 81 |
| 106 | -- | Ball St. | 0.164 | 0.305 | 116 | 14.1 | 104 | 27.1 | 110 | 165.4 | 71 |
| 107 | -2 | Kent St. | 0.142 | 0.453 | 79 | 10.8 | 117 | 22.1 | 82 | 166.9 | 54 |
| 108 | -1 | North Texas | 0.142 | 0.449 | 81 | 13.7 | 107 | 28.0 | 112 | 165.6 | 67 |
| 109 | +2 | Buffalo | 0.139 | 0.337 | 112 | 11.4 | 114 | 23.6 | 93 | 173.4 | 19 |
| 110 | +3 | LA-Monroe | 0.138 | 0.539 | 36 | 12.3 | 112 | 25.7 | 104 | 163.5 | 79 |
| 111 | -3 | Western Kentucky | 0.137 | 0.389 | 99 | 13.8 | 106 | 28.8 | 115 | 158.8 | 108 |
| 112 | -3 | Colorado St. | 0.137 | 0.348 | 110 | 12.8 | 111 | 26.7 | 108 | 158.0 | 111 |
| 113 | +2 | SJSU | 0.126 | 0.580 | 24 | 11.0 | 116 | 23.9 | 96 | 165.5 | 68 |
| 114 | -10 | UAB | 0.123 | 0.400 | 98 | 13.8 | 105 | 30.2 | 117 | 162.7 | 88 |
| 115 | -1 | New Mexico St. | 0.117 | 0.373 | 105 | 11.6 | 113 | 26.0 | 106 | 168.0 | 48 |
| 116 | +1 | FL-Atlantic | 0.081 | 0.459 | 78 | 10.6 | 118 | 28.1 | 113 | 159.5 | 106 |
| 117 | -1 | Eastern Michigan | 0.080 | 0.429 | 90 | 13.4 | 109 | 35.5 | 120 | 155.7 | 119 |
| 118 | -- | New Mexico | 0.076 | 0.486 | 66 | 10.0 | 119 | 27.1 | 109 | 170.5 | 29 |
| 119 | -- | Memphis | 0.062 | 0.422 | 94 | 11.1 | 115 | 32.9 | 119 | 164.5 | 74 |
| 120 | -- | Akron | 0.045 | 0.449 | 82 | 8.9 | 120 | 30.4 | 118 | 162.7 | 89 |
Follow us on Twitter @TFGridiron
Labels:
byu,
hawaii,
kansas state,
marshall,
miami-fl,
mississippi,
rankings,
Tulane,
UAB,
utah,
vanderbilt
Wednesday, January 26, 2011
2010 - 2011: Final Rankings -- TFG
Biggest jumps: Tulsa (+9, 57 to 48); North Carolina State (+7, 33 to 26); Mississippi State (+7, 39 to 32); Syracuse (+7, 83 to 76).
Biggest drops: Michigan State (-8, 35 to 43); Navy (-6, 38 to 44); Connecticut (-6, 49 to 55); Hawaii (-6, 52 to 58).
Full rankings after the jump
Biggest drops: Michigan State (-8, 35 to 43); Navy (-6, 38 to 44); Connecticut (-6, 49 to 55); Hawaii (-6, 52 to 58).
Full rankings after the jump
Labels:
connecticut,
hawaii,
michigan state,
mississippi state,
navy,
north carolina state,
rankings,
syracuse,
tulsa
Monday, December 20, 2010
2010 Bowl Previews: Part V
Part V of our bowl preview. Part IV was yesterday.
#23: Hawaii Bowl (December 24, 2010)
Hawaii Warriors (10-3, 7-1 WAC) vs. Tulsa Golden Hurricane (9-3, 6-2 C-USA)
GUGS: 46.9
Justin: GUGS really like this bowl because the teams are reasonably good, the score will be reasonably high, and it will extremely close. Both (52) Hawaii and (57) Tulsa are within 1.1 PPH of each other on both sides of the ball. The Warriors will have home-field advantage on this one, which traditionally has helped them out more than home-field advantage for other teams. Tulsa plays at a sightly higher pace than Hawaii, so the Golden Hurricane may choose to speed things up and see if they can get Hawaii off their game. Either way, this will be a coin toss, with TFG favoring Hawaii, 36-35.
Eddie: RBA doesn't see this one being quite as close as TFG does. (59) Hawaii and (64) Tulsa are relatively even offensively, separated by only 0.6 PPH. The real difference is on defense. One doesn't think of Hawaii and defense in the same sentence very often, but they hold a 2.9 PPH advantage over the Golden Hurricane defensively. Adding in home field advantage, this one looks like a Hawaii victory, 38-28, with 54.4% confidence.
#22: Beef ‘O’Brady’s Bowl (December 21, 2010)
Southern Miss Golden Eagles (8-4, 5-3 C-USA) vs. Louisville Cardinals (6-6, 3-4 Big East)
GUGS: 47.9
Eddie: Justin will tell you I'm lying, but I have actually heard of this bowl, thanks to its ridiculous name. (44) Louisville has been one of the RBA surprise teams of 2010. Charlie Strong has turned the Cardinals around from being atrocious to being on the fringe of respectability, as evidenced by their 1.0 +/- 20.7 PPH defense. Their offense isn't much to write home about thanks to a variance of 34.9 PPH, but they've been able to manage. (57) Southern Miss is more consistent on both sides of the ball but exhibits a worse production on average than Louisville. Long-time readers know that I'm a closeted Golden Eagle fan, but it doesn't look like they're going to pull this one out. RBA picks Louisville, 31-27, with 69.5% confidence.
Justin: I've never heard of this bowl, and neither have you (don't lie). The (48) Cardinals play slow, deliberate, and underwhelming football. In other words, they're in the Big East. The (60) Golden Eagles are a bit more uptempo, good offense/bad defense than Louisville, and are 8 points away from being 11-1. This looks to be another close one, but right now the coin toss lands in Louisville's favor. If Southern Miss can find some defense, though, they should be able to stop Louisville's anemic offense. Until then, TFG picks Louisville, 33-32.
#21: Liberty Bowl (December 31, 2010)
UCF Knights (10-3, 7-1 C-USA) vs. Georgia Bulldogs (6-6, 3-5 SEC)
GUGS: 49.2
Justin: The (23) Bulldogs are a much better team than their 6-6 record indicates, and the (40) Knights aren't as good as their 10-3 record might show. Both teams, however, play slow; don't expect this one to break 160 plays. Georgia is tied for the 8th most efficient offense in FBS (26.5 PPH) but is being held back by a sub-par defense that allows 17.8 PPH. The Knights have a slightly better defense (16.7 PPH) but is about 6.0 PPH short on offense. This slow, grind-em-out game is going to work in Georgia's favor. TFG gives the Dawgs a slight nod, with a 35-31 win predicted at 62.7% confidence.
Eddie: (21) Georgia is one of the most inconsistent teams in college football. Their offensive variance is 33.9 PPH, and their defensive variance is 25.9 PPH. When they're playing to their potential, the Bulldogs can steamroll someone. The question is whether (61) UCF can prevent that from happening with an offense and defense that are also fairly inconsistent. If both teams play to the mean, Georgia stomps all over UCF thanks to a 15.7 PPH offensive advantage and an 8.6 PPH defensive advantage. RBA says Georgia rolls 38-17 with 82.9% confidence.
#23: Hawaii Bowl (December 24, 2010)
Hawaii Warriors (10-3, 7-1 WAC) vs. Tulsa Golden Hurricane (9-3, 6-2 C-USA)
GUGS: 46.9
Justin: GUGS really like this bowl because the teams are reasonably good, the score will be reasonably high, and it will extremely close. Both (52) Hawaii and (57) Tulsa are within 1.1 PPH of each other on both sides of the ball. The Warriors will have home-field advantage on this one, which traditionally has helped them out more than home-field advantage for other teams. Tulsa plays at a sightly higher pace than Hawaii, so the Golden Hurricane may choose to speed things up and see if they can get Hawaii off their game. Either way, this will be a coin toss, with TFG favoring Hawaii, 36-35.
Eddie: RBA doesn't see this one being quite as close as TFG does. (59) Hawaii and (64) Tulsa are relatively even offensively, separated by only 0.6 PPH. The real difference is on defense. One doesn't think of Hawaii and defense in the same sentence very often, but they hold a 2.9 PPH advantage over the Golden Hurricane defensively. Adding in home field advantage, this one looks like a Hawaii victory, 38-28, with 54.4% confidence.
#22: Beef ‘O’Brady’s Bowl (December 21, 2010)
Southern Miss Golden Eagles (8-4, 5-3 C-USA) vs. Louisville Cardinals (6-6, 3-4 Big East)
GUGS: 47.9
Eddie: Justin will tell you I'm lying, but I have actually heard of this bowl, thanks to its ridiculous name. (44) Louisville has been one of the RBA surprise teams of 2010. Charlie Strong has turned the Cardinals around from being atrocious to being on the fringe of respectability, as evidenced by their 1.0 +/- 20.7 PPH defense. Their offense isn't much to write home about thanks to a variance of 34.9 PPH, but they've been able to manage. (57) Southern Miss is more consistent on both sides of the ball but exhibits a worse production on average than Louisville. Long-time readers know that I'm a closeted Golden Eagle fan, but it doesn't look like they're going to pull this one out. RBA picks Louisville, 31-27, with 69.5% confidence.
Justin: I've never heard of this bowl, and neither have you (don't lie). The (48) Cardinals play slow, deliberate, and underwhelming football. In other words, they're in the Big East. The (60) Golden Eagles are a bit more uptempo, good offense/bad defense than Louisville, and are 8 points away from being 11-1. This looks to be another close one, but right now the coin toss lands in Louisville's favor. If Southern Miss can find some defense, though, they should be able to stop Louisville's anemic offense. Until then, TFG picks Louisville, 33-32.
#21: Liberty Bowl (December 31, 2010)
UCF Knights (10-3, 7-1 C-USA) vs. Georgia Bulldogs (6-6, 3-5 SEC)
GUGS: 49.2
Justin: The (23) Bulldogs are a much better team than their 6-6 record indicates, and the (40) Knights aren't as good as their 10-3 record might show. Both teams, however, play slow; don't expect this one to break 160 plays. Georgia is tied for the 8th most efficient offense in FBS (26.5 PPH) but is being held back by a sub-par defense that allows 17.8 PPH. The Knights have a slightly better defense (16.7 PPH) but is about 6.0 PPH short on offense. This slow, grind-em-out game is going to work in Georgia's favor. TFG gives the Dawgs a slight nod, with a 35-31 win predicted at 62.7% confidence.
Eddie: (21) Georgia is one of the most inconsistent teams in college football. Their offensive variance is 33.9 PPH, and their defensive variance is 25.9 PPH. When they're playing to their potential, the Bulldogs can steamroll someone. The question is whether (61) UCF can prevent that from happening with an offense and defense that are also fairly inconsistent. If both teams play to the mean, Georgia stomps all over UCF thanks to a 15.7 PPH offensive advantage and an 8.6 PPH defensive advantage. RBA says Georgia rolls 38-17 with 82.9% confidence.
| Home | Visitors | Odds | Home | Visitors | Odds | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (52) | Hawaii | 36 | (57) | Tulsa | 35 | 52.5 | (59) | Hawaii | 38 | (64) | Tulsa | 28 | 54.4 |
| (48) | Louisville | 33 | (60) | Southern Miss. | 32 | 56.4 | (44) | Louisville | 31 | (57) | Southern Miss. | 27 | 69.5 |
| (40) | UCF | 31 | (23) | Georgia | 35 | 62.7 | (61) | UCF | 17 | (21) | Georgia | 38 | 82.8 |
Labels:
bowl previews,
georgia,
hawaii,
louisville,
southern mississippi,
tulsa,
ucf
Tuesday, October 26, 2010
Week 9: Full Rankings -- TFG
Biggest jumps: Hawaii (+16, 71 to 55); Temple (+15, 74 to 59); Louisville (+12, 51 to 39).
Biggest drops: Purdue (-18, 58 to 76); Connecticut (-15, 50 to 65); North Carolina (-13, 19 to 32).
Full rankings after the jump.
Biggest drops: Purdue (-18, 58 to 76); Connecticut (-15, 50 to 65); North Carolina (-13, 19 to 32).
Full rankings after the jump.
Labels:
connecticut,
hawaii,
louisville,
north carolina,
purdue,
rankings,
temple
Tuesday, December 8, 2009
Week 15: Full Rankings -- TFG
Biggest jumps: Washington (+15, 71 to 56); Wisconsin (+6, 37 to 31); Central Michigan (+4, 40 to 36); Michigan (+4, 68 to 64); LA Tech (+4, 70 to 66).
Biggest drops: California (-10, 43 to 53); Ohio (-10, 60 to 70); Hawaii (-5, 90 to 95).
Biggest drops: California (-10, 43 to 53); Ohio (-10, 60 to 70); Hawaii (-5, 90 to 95).
Labels:
california,
central michigan,
hawaii,
la tech,
michigan,
ohio,
rankings,
washington,
wisconsin
Monday, November 9, 2009
Week 10: Summary
Overall it was a brutal week for predictions. Of the 11 games where the favorite had between a 50% and 60% chance to win, I got two correct (Hawaii and LA-Monroe). Throw in Notre Dame-Navy (with the 60.2% chance of getting it right) and I went 2-for-12 in predicting close games. Those are a lot of bad bounces. Overall my record for this week was 36-17, bringing the total for the last three weeks to 122-41 for an accuracy of 74.8%. In my next post I'll examine some changes I'm making to my system in response to observations and feedback. But first, the Week 10 recap ....
Games To Watch
(25) Oregon State at (39) California.
I said: Vegas -- and my numbers -- say Cal is the favorite, but look for Oregon State to pull off the upset.
Result: Correct. OSU took control of this game early on and didn't let go.
(33) Navy at (35) Notre Dame.
I said: I predict that Notre Dame will pull off the victory, but only at the end and only if they can keep Navy from getting some quick points.
Result: Somewhat near the target but ultimately wrong. Navy scored on their first two drives to go up 14-0 at the start of the second quarter. Notre Dame missed two FGs -- including one from the Navy 12 -- gave up a safety, and just couldn't pull it together. In every category except the one that mattered, Notre Dame one-upped Navy: yards, first downs, punts, etc. With two minutes left, Notre Dame still had a shot to win, they just couldn't get it done.
(47) Houston at (56) Tulsa.
I said: The main question is whether or not Tulsa will be able to keep up with Houston's frantic pace, averaging an NCAA-high 185 plays per game. The numbers give Tulsa a 51% nod in what will be a fast-and-furious high-scoring game.
Result: I'm pretty disappointed I didn't get this one right. I looked at the boxscore and saw Tulsa up 8 with 2:30 minutes to go and Houston at midfield. Here I thought the worse that would happen would be overtime. And up 2 with 0:25 left? Surely this one was in the bag. But no. These are the kinds of games that drive me crazy because you're left wondering if there was anything you could have done differently to predict a Houston win. Sometimes ... it just doesn't work out.
Coin Toss Game of the Week
(90) Utah State at (101) Hawaii. Not nearly as close as the numbers predicted. This appears to be a growing trend.
Games To Watch
(25) Oregon State at (39) California.
I said: Vegas -- and my numbers -- say Cal is the favorite, but look for Oregon State to pull off the upset.
Result: Correct. OSU took control of this game early on and didn't let go.
(33) Navy at (35) Notre Dame.
I said: I predict that Notre Dame will pull off the victory, but only at the end and only if they can keep Navy from getting some quick points.
Result: Somewhat near the target but ultimately wrong. Navy scored on their first two drives to go up 14-0 at the start of the second quarter. Notre Dame missed two FGs -- including one from the Navy 12 -- gave up a safety, and just couldn't pull it together. In every category except the one that mattered, Notre Dame one-upped Navy: yards, first downs, punts, etc. With two minutes left, Notre Dame still had a shot to win, they just couldn't get it done.
(47) Houston at (56) Tulsa.
I said: The main question is whether or not Tulsa will be able to keep up with Houston's frantic pace, averaging an NCAA-high 185 plays per game. The numbers give Tulsa a 51% nod in what will be a fast-and-furious high-scoring game.
Result: I'm pretty disappointed I didn't get this one right. I looked at the boxscore and saw Tulsa up 8 with 2:30 minutes to go and Houston at midfield. Here I thought the worse that would happen would be overtime. And up 2 with 0:25 left? Surely this one was in the bag. But no. These are the kinds of games that drive me crazy because you're left wondering if there was anything you could have done differently to predict a Houston win. Sometimes ... it just doesn't work out.
Coin Toss Game of the Week
(90) Utah State at (101) Hawaii. Not nearly as close as the numbers predicted. This appears to be a growing trend.
Labels:
california,
hawaii,
houston,
navy,
notre dame,
oregon state,
recap,
tulsa,
utah state
Wednesday, November 4, 2009
Week 10: Predictions
Last week saw several exciting games, and Week 10 is already off to an equally exciting start. Last night Bowling Green beat Buffalo on an 18-yard TD with 0:39 remaining. The numbers had Buffalo winning 31-24, but only with 50.2% odds. Barring a touchdown from the 7 on 4th down as time expires, games generally don't come much closer than that. With that, I bring you ...
Games To Watch
(25) Oregon State at (39) California. This has the potential to be a fast game (around 174 plays) with OK but not excellent defenses. Oregon State has a similar offensive efficiency as Iowa, they just need to step it up on the defensive side. California will have the home-field advantage, pushing their defense into West Virginia territory and essentially equivalent to Oregon State. They'll need to step it up on offense to keep up with Oregon State. Vegas -- and my numbers -- say Cal is the favorite, but look for Oregon State to pull off the upset.
(33) Navy at (35) Notre Dame. These are two teams headed in opposite directions in the rankings. Two weeks ago Notre Dame was in the top 25 and Navy was struggling to stay in the top 40. Now Notre Dame is only the favorite by virtue of being the home team, hanging their hats on their defensive rating of 15.6. Navy has a solid offense, though, with an efficiency similar to that of Alabama (24.2). Notre Dame are 11-point favorites, but I see this game being much closer, with the Fighting Irish having only a 60.2% chance of pulling off the victory. I predict that Notre Dame will pull off the victory, but only at the end and only if they can keep Navy from getting some quick points.
(47) Houston at (56) Tulsa. Houston currently sits at #15 in the BCS polls, but I don't believe that and neither do the oddsmakers; they're currently split on this game, and for good reason. Houston has all the defensive abilities of Michigan and the offensive firepower of Nevada. If that doesn't sound like a top 15 BCS team then ... well, it shouldn't. Houston has racked up some impressive wins against less-than-impressive opposition. Tulsa has done more of the same, playing an even weaker slate than Houston. They don't have the offensive weapons that Houston does, but has a reasonable defense. The main question is whether or not Tulsa will be able to keep up with Houston's frantic pace, averaging an NCAA-high 185 plays per game. The numbers give Tulsa a 51% nod in what will be a fast-and-furious high-scoring game.
Coin Toss Game of the Week
(90) Utah State at (101) Hawaii. Not exactly Penn State/Ohio State, but this one should be much closer. Hawaii is the 50.9-49.1 favorite in this one. The numbers say Hawaii, but your guess is as good as mine.
The Bottom Line
The numbers say they should get 40 of the 52 games this week correct for a 76.9% accuracy rate. They've started out 1-for-2, getting UCF over Marshall but missing Buffalo-Bowling Green. Full predictions after the jump.
Games To Watch
(25) Oregon State at (39) California. This has the potential to be a fast game (around 174 plays) with OK but not excellent defenses. Oregon State has a similar offensive efficiency as Iowa, they just need to step it up on the defensive side. California will have the home-field advantage, pushing their defense into West Virginia territory and essentially equivalent to Oregon State. They'll need to step it up on offense to keep up with Oregon State. Vegas -- and my numbers -- say Cal is the favorite, but look for Oregon State to pull off the upset.
(33) Navy at (35) Notre Dame. These are two teams headed in opposite directions in the rankings. Two weeks ago Notre Dame was in the top 25 and Navy was struggling to stay in the top 40. Now Notre Dame is only the favorite by virtue of being the home team, hanging their hats on their defensive rating of 15.6. Navy has a solid offense, though, with an efficiency similar to that of Alabama (24.2). Notre Dame are 11-point favorites, but I see this game being much closer, with the Fighting Irish having only a 60.2% chance of pulling off the victory. I predict that Notre Dame will pull off the victory, but only at the end and only if they can keep Navy from getting some quick points.
(47) Houston at (56) Tulsa. Houston currently sits at #15 in the BCS polls, but I don't believe that and neither do the oddsmakers; they're currently split on this game, and for good reason. Houston has all the defensive abilities of Michigan and the offensive firepower of Nevada. If that doesn't sound like a top 15 BCS team then ... well, it shouldn't. Houston has racked up some impressive wins against less-than-impressive opposition. Tulsa has done more of the same, playing an even weaker slate than Houston. They don't have the offensive weapons that Houston does, but has a reasonable defense. The main question is whether or not Tulsa will be able to keep up with Houston's frantic pace, averaging an NCAA-high 185 plays per game. The numbers give Tulsa a 51% nod in what will be a fast-and-furious high-scoring game.
Coin Toss Game of the Week
(90) Utah State at (101) Hawaii. Not exactly Penn State/Ohio State, but this one should be much closer. Hawaii is the 50.9-49.1 favorite in this one. The numbers say Hawaii, but your guess is as good as mine.
The Bottom Line
The numbers say they should get 40 of the 52 games this week correct for a 76.9% accuracy rate. They've started out 1-for-2, getting UCF over Marshall but missing Buffalo-Bowling Green. Full predictions after the jump.
Labels:
california,
hawaii,
houston,
navy,
notre dame,
oregon state,
predictions,
tulsa,
utah state
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)