Date | TFG | RBA | Away Team | TFG | RBA | Home Team | Plays | Odds TFG / RBA |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2010/09/04 | 103 | / 104 | Arkansas St. | 26 | at | 33 | / 33 | Auburn | 52 | 181 | 91.9% | / 86.8% |
2010/09/09 | 31 | / 32 | Auburn | 17 | at | 39 | / 35 | Mississippi St. | 14 | 157 | 40.1% | / 63.8% |
2010/09/18 | 21 | / 22 | Clemson | 24 | at | 31 | / 26 | Auburn | 27 | 174 | 52.7% | / 55.0% |
2010/09/25 | 22 | / 19 | South Carolina | 27 | at | 28 | / 22 | Auburn | 35 | 158 | 55.9% | / 40.0% |
2010/10/02 | 105 | / 109 | LA-Monroe | 3 | at | 23 | / 24 | Auburn | 52 | 151 | 94.1% | / 90.5% |
2010/10/09 | 19 | / 20 | Auburn | 37 | at | 54 | / 44 | Kentucky | 34 | 157 | 64.6% | / 61.5% |
2010/10/16 | 18 | / 22 | Arkansas | 43 | at | 17 | / 17 | Auburn | 65 | 172 | 61.6% | / 54.8% |
2010/10/23 | 9 | / 12 | LSU | 17 | at | 16 | / 14 | Auburn | 24 | 159 | 47.6% | / 57.2% |
2010/10/30 | 15 | / 13 | Auburn | 51 | at | 47 | / 48 | Mississippi | 31 | 159 | 61.8% | / 70.2% |
2010/11/13 | 18 | / 21 | Georgia | 31 | at | 13 | / 11 | Auburn | 49 | 151 | 61.2% | / 51.4% |
2010/11/26 | 13 | / 12 | Auburn | 28 | at | 3 | / 4 | Alabama | 27 | 158 | 25.5% | / 23.5% |
2010/12/04 | 14 | / 18 | South Carolina | 17 | vs | 13 | / 8 | Auburn | 56 | 158 | 50.7% | / 56.1% |
2011/01/10 | 5 | / 4 | Oregon | 19 | vs | 10 | / 7 | Auburn | 22 | 182 | 42.9% | / 65.2% |
Auburn Tigers | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Year | WinPct | SoS | Off. | Def. | Pace | ||||||
2010 | 0.833 | 10 | 0.662 | 3 | 30.4 | 2 | 16.0 | 28 | 166.8 | 55 |
Justin
We've discussed this team a few times before. Their whole season was highly improbable, they often won by the skin of their teeth, and they had an absolutely atrocious defense. But just to recap some of the "highlights" of the Auburn season:
- a dropped TD pass by Clemson in OT;
- a last-minute field goal to beat Kentucky;
- three Alabama turnovers inside the Auburn 5;
- four failed attempts by the Ducks to punch it in from the 1 (yet they went 2-for-2 in 2pt conversions);
- a failure of the Ducks to get the easy 3 on a 4th-and-goal from the 1; and
- a tackle that was (correctly) called not-a-tackle in the closing minute of the title game.
Auburn Tigers | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Year | WinPct | SoS | Off. | Def. | Pace | ||||||
2010 | 0.957 | 7 | 0.545 | 25 | 26.1 | 1 | 13.0 | 36 | 158.9 | 117 |
Eddie
Our freshest national title memories come first in this countdown. There's little question that Auburn is the worst national champion of the last decade. Sure, they went undefeated, and that counts for something. However, that understates the way that they managed to go undefeated -- winning close games. The Tigers beat (35) Mississippi State by three, (22) Clemson by three, (45) Kentucky by three, (4) Alabama by one, and (4) Oregon by three. Some of those teams were pretty good, so why the disrespect? First, Auburn didn't play a lick of defense in 2010, and RBA favors teams that play good defense. Second, great teams whip opponents. Auburn simply didn't do that. They were marginally favored in several games and scraped by -- just as expected -- suggesting to the computer that they were properly ranked.
Follow us on Twitter at @TFGridiron.