| Colorado | 41 | Colorado St. | 27 | Final |
| Ohio | 7 | Louisville | 49 | Final |
Sunday, September 1, 2013
Saturday, August 31, 2013
Week 1: Saturday In-Game Win Probabilities
Last updated: Sun Sep 1 05:28:04 2013
| Virginia Tech | 10 | Alabama | 35 | Final |
| LA-Lafayette | 14 | Arkansas | 34 | Final |
| Washington St. | 24 | Auburn | 31 | Final |
| Northwestern | 44 | California | 30 | Final |
| Nevada | 20 | UCLA | 58 | Final |
| Purdue | 7 | Cincinnati | 42 | Final |
| Georgia | 35 | Clemson | 38 | Final |
| Toledo | 6 | Florida | 24 | Final |
| Northern Ill. | 30 | Iowa | 27 | Final |
| Western Kentucky | 35 | Kentucky | 26 | Final |
| TCU | 27 | LSU | 37 | Final |
| Miami-OH | 14 | Marshall | 52 | Final |
| FIU | 10 | Maryland | 43 | Final |
| Central Michigan | 9 | Michigan | 59 | Final |
| Oklahoma St. | 21 | Mississippi St. | 3 | Final |
| Wyoming | 34 | Nebraska | 37 | Final |
| UTSA | 21 | New Mexico | 13 | Final |
| LA Tech | 14 | North Carolina St. | 40 | Final |
| Idaho | 6 | North Texas | 40 | Final |
| Temple | 6 | Notre Dame | 28 | Final |
| Buffalo | 20 | Ohio St. | 40 | Final |
| LA-Monroe | 0 | Oklahoma | 34 | Final |
| Syracuse | 17 | Penn State | 23 | Final |
| Texas State | 22 | Southern Miss. | 15 | Final |
| Rice | 31 | Texas A&M | 52 | Final |
| New Mexico St. | 7 | Texas | 56 | Final |
| UAB | 31 | Troy | 34 | Final |
| BYU | 16 | Virginia | 19 | Final |
| Boise St. | 6 | Washington | 38 | Final |
| Massachusetts | 0 | Wisconsin | 45 | Final |
Labels:
in-game probabilities
Week 1: Saturday Predictions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Key | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Close game |
Certain victory |
||||||
Follow us on Twitter at @TFGridiron and @TFGLiveOdds.
Labels:
predictions
Friday, August 30, 2013
Week 1: Friday Predictions
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Key | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Close game |
Certain victory |
||||||
Follow us on Twitter at @TFGridiron and @TFGLiveOdds.
Labels:
predictions
Week 1: Friday In-Game Win Probabilities
Last updated: Sat Aug 31 04:58:03 2013
| FL-Atlantic | 6 | Miami-FL | 34 | Final |
| Western Michigan | 13 | Michigan St. | 26 | Final |
| Texas Tech | at | SMU | Later |
Labels:
in-game probabilities
Thursday, August 29, 2013
Week 1: Thursday Predictions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Key | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Close game |
Certain victory |
||||||
Follow us on Twitter at @TFGridiron and @TFGLiveOdds.
Labels:
predictions
Week 1: Thursday In-Game Win Probabilities
Last updated: Fri Aug 30 04:58:03 2013
| Tulsa | 7 | Bowling Green | 34 | Final |
| USC | 30 | Hawaii | 13 | Final |
| UNLV | 23 | Minnesota | 51 | Final |
| North Carolina | 10 | South Carolina | 27 | Final |
| Utah St. | 26 | Utah | 30 | Final |
| Mississippi | 39 | Vanderbilt | 35 | Final |
| Rutgers | at | Fresno St. | Later | |
| Akron | at | UCF | Later |
Labels:
in-game probabilities
Monday, August 26, 2013
Welcome to the 2013-2014 Season
Welcome to the 2013-2014 college football season!
The new season is only three days away, and Tempo-Free Gridiron is back for yet another year. Last year we rolled out our first real trial of in-game win probabilities. During each and every game of the 2013-2014 season we created graphs showing the current odds of each team winning. This year we're going to refine those models to provide better accuracy and precision.
We'll still be tweeting the probabilities for each game at the end of each quarter, as well as upset watches (a heavy pre-game favorite is likely to lose), upset warnings (a heavy pre-game favorite is on the verge of losing) and upset emergency notices (they're pretty much toast). So subscribe to our twitter feed (@TFGLiveOdds) for all that and more.
Along with the new content, there's the usual content, including
The new season is only three days away, and Tempo-Free Gridiron is back for yet another year. Last year we rolled out our first real trial of in-game win probabilities. During each and every game of the 2013-2014 season we created graphs showing the current odds of each team winning. This year we're going to refine those models to provide better accuracy and precision.
We'll still be tweeting the probabilities for each game at the end of each quarter, as well as upset watches (a heavy pre-game favorite is likely to lose), upset warnings (a heavy pre-game favorite is on the verge of losing) and upset emergency notices (they're pretty much toast). So subscribe to our twitter feed (@TFGLiveOdds) for all that and more.
Along with the new content, there's the usual content, including
- Undefeated Countdown. Every other Thursday starting in October we'll examine the remaining undefeated teams, their possible road to a perfect season, and the main obstacles in their way.
- Conference Projections. Starting in October we'll have a weekly breakdown of the twelve conferences, including both the current standings and the projected final standings.
- Games of the Week. Along with weekly predictions we'll focus on specific Saturday games that are interesting in some way or another.
Friday, March 1, 2013
The 2013 Sloan Sports Analytics Conference
Hello, Sloan Sports Analytics attendees!
This is the third year I'll be attending Sloan, but unfortunately my co-author can't make it again this year. For those of you who have never visited the blog before: welcome. (For those of you who have, this post will look eerily like last year's post.) We're a pair of Silicon Valley software engineers who moonlight as college football stats analysts, and occasionally we're not completely wrong. I'm Justin, the founder of the blog and curator of the Tempo-Free Gridiron (TFG) ranking and prediction system. A year into the blog, I managed to rope Eddie, a co-worker and Arkansas Razorback fanatic, into creating his own competing system; the result was the Regression-Based Analysis (RBA) algorithm.
To get a feel for what we do here, we invite you to take a look at some of the posts describing tempo-free statistics in general (courtesy of Dean Oliver via Ken Pomeroy), the motivation behind this particular blog, and a peek under the hood of the TFG system (and a recent update). We also have info about the RBA model (along with an update and yet another update). Recently we've also started exploring how to create viable in-game win probabilities.
Given that it's the college football offseason, there's not too much happening on an ongoing basis right now, and it'll be kind of quiet until August. However we invite you to look at some of the "best of" we've produced, as other posts of interest, including
All-in-all it's grown into a pretty complicated system backed by a lot of code we've written over the last few years. If you have any questions or feedback for us, don't hesitate to email us at our tempo-free-gridiron.com addresses (justin@ or eddie@), leave a comment here, or hit us up on Twitter.
Enjoy the conference, and we hope to see you there.
This is the third year I'll be attending Sloan, but unfortunately my co-author can't make it again this year. For those of you who have never visited the blog before: welcome. (For those of you who have, this post will look eerily like last year's post.) We're a pair of Silicon Valley software engineers who moonlight as college football stats analysts, and occasionally we're not completely wrong. I'm Justin, the founder of the blog and curator of the Tempo-Free Gridiron (TFG) ranking and prediction system. A year into the blog, I managed to rope Eddie, a co-worker and Arkansas Razorback fanatic, into creating his own competing system; the result was the Regression-Based Analysis (RBA) algorithm.
To get a feel for what we do here, we invite you to take a look at some of the posts describing tempo-free statistics in general (courtesy of Dean Oliver via Ken Pomeroy), the motivation behind this particular blog, and a peek under the hood of the TFG system (and a recent update). We also have info about the RBA model (along with an update and yet another update). Recently we've also started exploring how to create viable in-game win probabilities.
Given that it's the college football offseason, there's not too much happening on an ongoing basis right now, and it'll be kind of quiet until August. However we invite you to look at some of the "best of" we've produced, as other posts of interest, including
- the current rankings for TFG and RBA;
- our "Ask an Expert" feature, where readers get to ask the questions; and
- our trivia posts, particularly:
- a countdown of the best BCS champions from 2003 - 2010;
- an examination of the fact that not all undefeated non-BCS teams are created equal;
- a definition of an examination of the state of parity in college football; and
- some musings on what's up with the ACC.
During the regular season you can expect to find weekly posts showcasing
- top 25 and full rankings for TFG and RBA;
- weekly projections of final conference standings;
- analysis and predictions for all remaining undefeated FBS teams;
- in-depth analysis and predictions for two games of the week, highlighting our "Games You Gotta See" (GUGS) game quality rating metric;
- a recap of the past week, focusing specifically on the games of the week;
- bowl previews for each and every bowl game (including the lesser-known ones); and
- live in-game win probabilities, posted to the blog and our Twitter feed.
All-in-all it's grown into a pretty complicated system backed by a lot of code we've written over the last few years. If you have any questions or feedback for us, don't hesitate to email us at our tempo-free-gridiron.com addresses (justin@ or eddie@), leave a comment here, or hit us up on Twitter.
Enjoy the conference, and we hope to see you there.
Thursday, February 28, 2013
Exploring In-Game Win Probabilities [Updated]
This past year we've been working on providing live in-game win probabilities for every FBS game. By this, we mean that given the current situation on the field -- the teams playing, the score, the time remaining, possession, down, distance, and field position -- what are the odds that each time will win?
However the in-game win probabilities we posted this past season were a function only of team strength, offensive and defensive efficiency so far in the game, the magnitude of the lead, and the amount of time left. The obvious glaring deficiency here is that without possession, down, distance, and field position, we're blind to a late-game situation in which a team is driving down the field for a go-ahead score, or when a team with a lead has iced it by preventing the opposing team from ever getting the ball back. Can we quantify that, though? And to what extent are we flying blind by not having this data? Which matters most: possession, down, distance, or field position?
Let's examine our current model, see how it works, test how it's done, and then figure out how to improve it.
However the in-game win probabilities we posted this past season were a function only of team strength, offensive and defensive efficiency so far in the game, the magnitude of the lead, and the amount of time left. The obvious glaring deficiency here is that without possession, down, distance, and field position, we're blind to a late-game situation in which a team is driving down the field for a go-ahead score, or when a team with a lead has iced it by preventing the opposing team from ever getting the ball back. Can we quantify that, though? And to what extent are we flying blind by not having this data? Which matters most: possession, down, distance, or field position?
Let's examine our current model, see how it works, test how it's done, and then figure out how to improve it.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)